<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Zatz Not Funny! - Latest Comments in Xbox 360: Video-On-Demand Trojan Horse</title><link>http://znf.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://znf.disqus.com/xbox_360_video_on_demand_trojan_horse/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:13:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Xbox 360: Video-On-Demand Trojan Horse</title><link>http://zatznotfunny.com/2006-11/xbox-360-video-on-demand-trojan/#comment-2092026831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Despite any misgivings I have about DRM, I'd be sold on MS as a downloadable media provider if they were to offer more full-length high-def video and audio content (and a bigger place to store all of it).  I'm a huge iTunes fan now, but might be singing a different Zune if MS had a comparable or better selection.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:13:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xbox 360: Video-On-Demand Trojan Horse</title><link>http://zatznotfunny.com/2006-11/xbox-360-video-on-demand-trojan/#comment-2092026834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like this also relates back to your comments about Unbox the other day. With a regular XP computer and a 360, you should be able to play Unbox content.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HDTiVo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xbox 360: Video-On-Demand Trojan Horse</title><link>http://zatznotfunny.com/2006-11/xbox-360-video-on-demand-trojan/#comment-2092026829</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think Microsoft ever tried to hide these intentions. They saw the Xbox as a vehicle into the living room.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Initially, I think they thought the MCE would get more traction - but over time with cable offerings, price, and so on it became clear that wasn't the best strategy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Marman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:01:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xbox 360: Video-On-Demand Trojan Horse</title><link>http://zatznotfunny.com/2006-11/xbox-360-video-on-demand-trojan/#comment-2092026830</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm specifically referring to movie rentals via Internet/broadband going mainstream. Hopefully the cable and sat companies &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; feel the pressure and also decide to offer thousands of movies on demand via a usable interface.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Zatz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:16:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xbox 360: Video-On-Demand Trojan Horse</title><link>http://zatznotfunny.com/2006-11/xbox-360-video-on-demand-trojan/#comment-2092026836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The biggest barrier for Ineternet-based VOD is DRM. I don't know if that can be addressed at a level where the content owners will allow this form to go mainstream in 2007 (or ever?). Plus, the cable and sat guys aren't going to stand by and wait for Microsoft and Sony to steal away their lucrative business model either. I guess it depends on what you mean by mainstream. PVR/DVR tech has been around 10+ years, but it still hasn't seen the kind of mainstream penetration you'd expect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Drakken</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>